| 
					
							
        
    
        
						
			 | 
			
			
					    
					
        
         
          
         
	
            | Bigami ulovligt - polygami lovligt Fra : Knud Larsen | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 09:06 |  
  |   
            Også i UK taler man nu om muslimsk polygami, - det lader til at de fleste 
 europæiske lande tillader det, men går stille med dørene, indtil nogen 
 forlanger fakta på bordet.
 Men man KAN ikke bare stoppe folks århundredgamle kultur, vi kommer til at 
 leve med sharia i mange former, det kan ikke være anderledes.
 
 
 
  From The Times May 28, 2007
 
 
 Polygamous marriage is flourishing as the Government admits for the first 
 time that nearly a thousand men are living legally with multiple wives in 
 Britain.
 
 Although the families are entitled to claim social security for each wife, 
 no one has counted how many of them are on benefits.
 
 Ministers appear to be ignoring the separate practice of unauthorised 
 polygamy, which is said to have become commonplace in some Muslim 
 communities. The Ministry of Justice admits that it has no estimates of 
 numbers for these unions, which are often presided over by an Islamic 
 cleric.
 
 ----
 
 The Government has long reassured Parliament that its policy is to prevent 
 the formation of multiple marriages by refusing to allow second wives entry 
 into the country. Under British law, husbands and wives can have only one 
 spouse at a time. Multiple simultaneous marriages constitute bigamy, a 
 criminal offence.
 
 Britain does recognise polygamous marriages that have taken place in 
 countries where the custom is legal, such as Pakistan, Nigeria and India. 
 The Home Office said that multiple wives in polygamous marriages may be 
 allowed into the country as students or tourists.
 
 Officials are advised to let extra wives into Britain even if they suspect 
 that a husband is trying to cheat the system by getting bogus divorces.
 
 “Entry clearance may not be withheld from a second wife where the husband 
 has divorced his previous wife and the divorce is thought to be one of 
 convenience,” an immigration rulebook advises.
 
 “This is so, even if the husband is still living with the previous wife and 
 to issue the entry clearance would lead to the formation of a polygamous 
 household.”
 
 Opposition politicians are concerned about the burden being placed by 
 polygamy on the social security and tax systems.
 
 A husband may claim housing benefit for each wife even if she is abroad, for 
 up to 52 weeks, as long as the absence is temporary and for pressing 
 reasons. In a draft Commons reply released under the Freedom of Information 
 Act, officials explained another way in which the system made it easy to 
 receive handouts.
 
 “A polygamous marriage is the only circumstance in which an adult dependency 
 increase is payable in income-related benefits,” it stated. “In any other 
 circumstances an adult ‘dependent’ would have to make a separate claim.”
 
 To calculate the amount of income support that is payable to an extra wife, 
 officials subtract the rate paid to an individual from that paid to a 
 couple. This produces the amount that a cohabiting spouse is deemed to need 
 in social security benefits. If a man lives with two valid wives, his 
 household is paid the rate for a couple, plus an amount for the extra 
 spouse, the documents show.
 
 -----------
 
 “I’ve not been able to find out from the Government what the extent of the 
 problem is,” Mr Malins said. “It’s a very serious issue.”
 
 The practice is said to have become commonplace, at least among Kashmiris, a 
 group that accounts for most of the 747,000 Pakistanis in Britain.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
            
             |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
           Per Rønne (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Per Rønne | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 11:03 |  
  |  
 
            Knud Larsen <mafishmaskela@yahoo.invalid> wrote:
 > Polygamous marriage is flourishing as the Government admits for the first
 > time that nearly a thousand men are living legally with multiple wives in
 > Britain.
 > 
 > Although the families are entitled to claim social security for each wife,
 > no one has counted how many of them are on benefits.
 Ja, der er nogle der kan stikke hovedet i busken. En del af prisen for
 at have et valgsystem som det britiske.
 -- 
 Per Erik Rønne
 http://www.RQNNE.dk
            
             |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
           Per Vadmand (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Per Vadmand | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 11:17 |  
  |   
            "Per Rønne" wrote:
 
 >
 > Ja, der er nogle der kan stikke hovedet i busken. En del af prisen for
 > at have et valgsystem som det britiske.
 
 Hvad har de to ting med hinanden at gøre? Jeg ser ikke forbindelsen.
 
 Per V.
 
 
 -- 
 CEPOS: Concentration of Extraordinarily Preposterous Organized
 Self-assertiveness 
 
 
  
            
             |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
            Knud Larsen (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Knud Larsen | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 11:52 |  
  |   
            
 "Per Vadmand" <perve@post.tele.dk> wrote in message 
 news:465d4f1d$0$48954$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk...
 > "Per Rønne" wrote:
 >
 >>
 >> Ja, der er nogle der kan stikke hovedet i busken. En del af prisen for
 >> at have et valgsystem som det britiske.
 >
 > Hvad har de to ting med hinanden at gøre? Jeg ser ikke forbindelsen.
 
 Heller ikke her?
 
 
 
  
            
             |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
            Per Rønne (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Per Rønne | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 12:03 |  
  |  
 
            Per Vadmand <perve@post.tele.dk> wrote:
 > "Per Rønne" wrote:
 > 
 > > Ja, der er nogle der kan stikke hovedet i busken. En del af prisen for
 > > at have et valgsystem som det britiske.
 > 
 > Hvad har de to ting med hinanden at gøre? Jeg ser ikke forbindelsen.
 I et system som det britiske kan politiske rørelser i befolkningen kun i
 meget begrænset omfang slå igennem parlamentarisk.
 Helt anderledes med Danmark, hvad der klart kan ses af de to sidste
 tilfælde: DF og NA.
 -- 
 Per Erik Rønne
 http://www.RQNNE.dk
            
             |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
             Per Vadmand (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Per Vadmand | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 14:37 |  
  |  
 
            "Per Rønne" wrote:
 > I et system som det britiske kan politiske rørelser i befolkningen
 > kun i meget begrænset omfang slå igennem parlamentarisk.
 >
 > Helt anderledes med Danmark, hvad der klart kan ses af de to sidste
 > tilfælde: DF og NA.
 Nå, det var DET, du mente. Jeg troede, det var en eller anden forbindelse 
 mellem polygami og topartisystemer ...   
Per V.
 -- 
 CEPOS: Concentration of Extraordinarily Preposterous Organized
 Self-assertiveness 
            
              |   |   
            
        
 
            
         
              Bo Warming (30-05-2007) 
         
	
            | Kommentar Fra : Bo Warming | 
  Dato :  30-05-07 15:37 |  
  |  
 
            "Per Vadmand" <perve@post.tele.dk> skrev i en meddelelse 
 news:465d7de9$0$45849$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk...
 > "Per Rønne" wrote:
 >
 >> I et system som det britiske kan politiske rørelser i befolkningen
 >> kun i meget begrænset omfang slå igennem parlamentarisk.
 >>
 >> Helt anderledes med Danmark, hvad der klart kan ses af de to sidste
 >> tilfælde: DF og NA.
 >
 > Nå, det var DET, du mente. Jeg troede, det var en eller anden forbindelse 
 > mellem polygami og topartisystemer ...   
Drop smileyen
 Een mand een kone
 er klart i tråd med
 een mand een stemme
 og Muhamed var fordelingspolitisk socialist da han forbød at have haremmer 
 med mere end een kone, så der blev flere mænd der kunne få en kone
 Da han så fandt en lægger småpige og havde ramt 4-loftet mht koner, gik han 
 bare ud i ørken og fik en åbenbaring hvor ærkeenglen erklærede at Gud syns 
 profeter skal have lov til mere end 4 koner
 Det trick brugte han i mange sammenhænge og det er aldrig blevet kritiseret 
 af de ikke-vantro.
 Jo i Afghanistan traf jeg en akademiker der var muslim og på tomandshånd 
 kunne grine af Muhamedsocialismens undtagelsesparagraf. 
            
              |   |   
            
        
 
    
 
					
					 
			 | 
			
				
        
			 |